National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Crime Watch | TV Listings | Lottery | Bio's | FCC File | More ›
   
   
 
Court Hears 'Rescue' Funding Arguments
Written by Your 5News Team
Last updated on September 04, 2012 @ 7:25PM
Created on September 04, 2012 @ 1:47PM
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) - West Virginia's Supreme Court must decide whether the judicial branch is unique enough to allow special campaign finance rules. This comes after a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a pilot program for campaign financing of state supreme court candidates.
    
Court candidate Allen Loughry has received public funds through a pilot program. That program also offers so-called rescue funds triggered by other candidates' spending.
    
But the State Election Commission has withheld matching funds from Loughry because of federal rulings against such funding in other states.
    
A lawyer for Loughry argued at a Tuesday hearing that those rulings should not apply to West Virginia's program. Lawyer Adam Skaggs said the state has a compelling interest to eliminate the appearance of bias among the judiciary. He argued that justifies the public financing program and its rescue funding provision.
    
But several justices questioned whether the U.S. Supreme Court distinguishes between judicial and other elections.
 

Share
Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (0)
WDTV on Facebook
WDTV on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV RSS Feeds
WDTV SMS
WDTV Mobile App