• Tygarts Valley 59Hannan 8Final[ view all ]
  • Sissonville 26Liberty 7Final[ view all ]
  • Doddridge County 27Valley Wetzel 7Final[ view all ]
  • Clay-Battelle 20Van 12Final[ view all ]
  • Lewis County 42Elkins 0Final[ view all ]
  • Braxton County 13Webster County 12Final[ view all ]
  • Grafton 50Lincoln 49Final[ view all ]
  • Robert C. Byrd 56North Marion 21Final[ view all ]
  • Morgantown 21John Marshall 6Final[ view all ]
  • Pendleton County 50Tucker County 6Final[ view all ]
  • Magnolia 34Tyler Consolidated 0Final[ view all ]
  • University 29Preston 25Final[ view all ]
  • Fairmont Senior 35Buckhannon-Upshur 27Final[ view all ]
  • Notre Dame 34Gilmer County 13Final[ view all ]
  • Saint Marys 42South Harrison 7Final[ view all ]
NOW PLAYING: 5 News Weekend Edition 11:00 PM - 11:35 PMWATCH NOW!
National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Crime Watch | TV Listings | Lottery | Bio's | FCC File | More ›
Court Rules in Bridgeport's Favor on Fire Fee
Written by Your 5News Team
Last updated on February 11, 2013 @ 11:41PM
Created on February 11, 2013 @ 2:47PM
(Connect Bridgeport) - Bridgeport City Manager Kim Haws has long felt comfortable about his city’s decision to charge a fire fee to non-residents that lived in the city’s first due response area. But that comfort didn’t guarantee that a challenge of the legality of the fire fee on non-residents would survive a test of the courts.
On Friday, it was learned the fee that has been in place since 2011 is legally sound, according to Harrison County Circuit Judge Thomas A. Bedell. Bedell ruled in favor of Bridgeport’s motion of summary judgment.
“It’s been a long time coming,” Haws said. “We’ve always felt comfortable that we were well within the law to do what we did. This just confirms that what we’re doing, making sure everyone pays their fair share, is backed by the law.”
Norm Farley, the city’s attorney on the case, was much like Haws. He was comfortable with the case going in Bridgeport’s favor.
“I thought we had a very strong case. The city used a statute which specifically provides for having people who receive a service – water, sewer, storm water or others – that live outside the city providing that service, that they pay a fee for that service,” Farley said. “There are cases in West Virginia over the years for such services out of Princeton, Charleston, Huntington and one a year or two ago involving the City of Hurricane on this type of topic that ruled in the favor of the cities. We thought there was last in the state that supported the action of (Bridgeport) City Council in imposing the fire free through ordinance.”
While Bridgeport has won this round, it doesn’t necessarily mean the battle is over. Farley said the plaintiff, listed as Adam Davisson, could file an appeal with the West Virginia Supreme Court.  Click Here to read more.

Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (0)
WDTV on Facebook
WDTV on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV Mobile App