• South Harrison 35Doddridge County 7Final[ view all ]
  • Bellaire Saint John's-OH 26Notre Dame 14Final[ view all ]
  • Preston 30Hampshire 20Final[ view all ]
  • Calhoun County 13Gilmer County 0Final[ view all ]
  • Morgantown 50Anacostia-DC 30Final[ view all ]
  • Lincoln 33Braxton County 6Final[ view all ]
  • Clay-Battelle 46Valley Fayette 25Final[ view all ]
  • Oak Hill 31Lewis County 21Final[ view all ]
  • Pocahontas County 52Tucker County 16Final[ view all ]
  • Pendleton County 39Tygarts Valley 15Final[ view all ]
  • Saint Marys 55Ritchie County 8Final[ view all ]
  • Fairmont Senior 24Robert C. Byrd 13Final[ view all ]
  • Grafton 21Philip Barbour 14Final[ view all ]
  • Williamstown 38Tyler Consolidated 21Final[ view all ]
  • Elkins 17North Marion 14Final[ view all ]
  • East Fairmont 17Liberty 0Final[ view all ]
  • John Marshall 22University 11Final[ view all ]
  • Bridgeport 50Buckhannon-Upshur 13Final[ view all ]
  • Valley Wetzel 0Bridgeport-OH 0Sat.[ view all ]
National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Local Jobs | TV Listings | Lottery | Bio's | Mix 104 Radio | More ›
Lawsuit Filed Against Campaign Finance Pilot Program
Written by Your 5News Team
Last updated on August 14, 2012 @ 7:27PM
Created on August 14, 2012 @ 6:34PM
Some officials are challenging a pilot program that would give public money to help finance campaigns for state supreme court candidates.

Former West Virginia Democrat Party Chairman Mike Callaghan is filed a lawsuit in federal court to challenge the constitutionality of the state's public campaign financing pilot program. That law uses tax payer money to match campaign contributions for state supreme court candidates only. And this pilot program will take effect only during the 2012 election cycle. Candidates can choose whether or not to accept the money.

Metronews is reporting Republican Supreme Court Candidate Allen Loughry has received $350,000  in state money. Under this law he can get an additional $700,000 based on the amount the other candidates have raised.

The State Election Committee has refused to release that money after the program's constitutionality came under fire. The point of it is to cut back on special interest campaign contributions  because a justice needs to be politically impartial. But some argue the dollar for dollar match has donors question if their contribution is really helping their candidate thus an infringement on free speech.

The State Supreme Court will hear arguments on this case on September fourth.

Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (0)
5 News Most Popular
WDTV on Facebook
WDTV on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV Mobile App