• Tygarts Valley 59Hannan 8Final[ view all ]
  • Sissonville 26Liberty 7Final[ view all ]
  • Doddridge County 27Valley Wetzel 7Final[ view all ]
  • Clay-Battelle 20Van 12Final[ view all ]
  • Lewis County 42Elkins 0Final[ view all ]
  • Braxton County 13Webster County 12Final[ view all ]
  • Grafton 50Lincoln 49Final[ view all ]
  • Robert C. Byrd 56North Marion 21Final[ view all ]
  • Morgantown 21John Marshall 6Final[ view all ]
  • Pendleton County 50Tucker County 6Final[ view all ]
  • Magnolia 34Tyler Consolidated 0Final[ view all ]
  • University 29Preston 25Final[ view all ]
  • Fairmont Senior 35Buckhannon-Upshur 27Final[ view all ]
  • Notre Dame 34Gilmer County 13Final[ view all ]
  • Saint Marys 42South Harrison 7Final[ view all ]
National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Crime Watch | TV Listings | Lottery | Bio's | FCC File | More ›
Lawsuit Filed Against Campaign Finance Pilot Program
Written by Your 5News Team
Last updated on August 14, 2012 @ 7:27PM
Created on August 14, 2012 @ 6:34PM
Some officials are challenging a pilot program that would give public money to help finance campaigns for state supreme court candidates.

Former West Virginia Democrat Party Chairman Mike Callaghan is filed a lawsuit in federal court to challenge the constitutionality of the state's public campaign financing pilot program. That law uses tax payer money to match campaign contributions for state supreme court candidates only. And this pilot program will take effect only during the 2012 election cycle. Candidates can choose whether or not to accept the money.

Metronews is reporting Republican Supreme Court Candidate Allen Loughry has received $350,000  in state money. Under this law he can get an additional $700,000 based on the amount the other candidates have raised.

The State Election Committee has refused to release that money after the program's constitutionality came under fire. The point of it is to cut back on special interest campaign contributions  because a justice needs to be politically impartial. But some argue the dollar for dollar match has donors question if their contribution is really helping their candidate thus an infringement on free speech.

The State Supreme Court will hear arguments on this case on September fourth.

Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (0)
WDTV on Facebook
WDTV on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV Mobile App