• Parkersburg Catholic 41Gilmer County 20Final[ view all ]
  • South Harrison 14Paden City 6Final[ view all ]
  • Valley Wetzel 22Tyler Consolidated 36Final[ view all ]
  • Grafton 54North Marion 28Final[ view all ]
  • Buckhannon-Upshur 44Preston 14Final[ view all ]
  • Tucker County 42Petersburg 0Final[ view all ]
  • Robert C. Byrd 21Elkins 0Final[ view all ]
  • Clay-Battelle 18Notre Dame 36Final[ view all ]
  • Bridgeport 42Fairmont Senior 7Final[ view all ]
  • Liberty 7Doddridge County 26Final[ view all ]
  • Williamstown 24Ritchie County 6Final[ view all ]
  • University 27Morgantown 20Final[ view all ]
  • East Fairmont 21Philip Barbour 7Final[ view all ]
National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Crime Watch | TV Lisitngs | Lottery | Bio's | FCC File | More ›
How Far Would You Go To Protect Your Home? "Stand Your Ground Law" Facing Changes
Written by Your 5News Team
Last updated on March 18, 2013 @ 12:24AM
Created on March 17, 2013 @ 9:50PM
"A guy's carrying your DVD player out the door. Can you use force to stop that guy?" asked CPL Waggamon of the WV State Police.
Now, you may be able to use deadly force to stop someone from stealing your property.
Our state honors the Stand Your Ground Law. Under West Virginia code 55-7-22: " A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence is justified in using reasonable and proportionate force, including deadly force, against an intruder or attacker to prevent a forcible entry..."
But now, there's some proposed changes to the law.
CPL. Waggamon added, "The Legislature does wants to change the law, to eliminate some of the grey area that's there. It doesn't really give you the rules in black and white. The whole thing's grey."
That's the current law. But the grey area is the problem. You must use "proportionate force." That means you must decide quickly if you're being threatened enough to kill someone. And what's proportionate force for a 100 pound woman, is not the same as it would be for a 200 pound man.
"You can't just shoot someone because they're walking on your property. You've got to be in fear for your safety. It still has to be investigated. It's just not automatic, where you shoot and kill someone, and then you're off the hook. It doesn't work like that."
Changes in the bill would remove the part requiring self-defense to be proportionate to the attack. It would also mean you could use force to protect another person.  And it authorizes the use of deadly force against someone they believe is committing a robbery.
So, you might not have to worry as much about being sued by the family of the attacker, which has happened.
Military Veteran Brittany Wallace said, "Yes, I do think that's a good idea. If I feel my life is being threatened, and I shoot and there's a whole bunch of questions, I'm just going to be happen to be alive."
Critics of the law say it encourages a "shoot first, ask questions later" attitude.
While the bill will help to eliminate the grey areas of the current laws, the general rule of thumb: "Use common sense."

Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (2)
Mar 19, 2013 at 9:16 AM
I will always do what I feel I must do to protect me, my family and my property from those who think they can just continue robbing, killing others and continue having crooked judges/lawyers get them off to do it over and over again! We have a RIGHT to defend ourselves in this country; although a lot of left-leaning nuts think otherwise! With the drug usage in this country...it is getting worse; decent folks have the right to take care of business when threatened by useless degenerates.
Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM
It is about time that taxpaying people has the right to protect all they work for from people stealing for drug money
WVFX FOX10 on Facebook
WVFX FOX10 on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV Mobile App