• Tygarts Valley 59Hannan 8Final[ view all ]
  • Sissonville 26Liberty 7Final[ view all ]
  • Doddridge County 27Valley Wetzel 7Final[ view all ]
  • Clay-Battelle 20Van 12Final[ view all ]
  • Lewis County 42Elkins 0Final[ view all ]
  • Braxton County 13Webster County 12Final[ view all ]
  • Grafton 50Lincoln 49Final[ view all ]
  • Robert C. Byrd 56North Marion 21Final[ view all ]
  • Morgantown 21John Marshall 6Final[ view all ]
  • Pendleton County 50Tucker County 6Final[ view all ]
  • Magnolia 34Tyler Consolidated 0Final[ view all ]
  • University 29Preston 25Final[ view all ]
  • Fairmont Senior 35Buckhannon-Upshur 27Final[ view all ]
  • Notre Dame 34Gilmer County 13Final[ view all ]
  • Saint Marys 42South Harrison 7Final[ view all ]
National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Crime Watch | TV Lisitngs | Lottery | Bio's | FCC File | More ›
How Far Would You Go To Protect Your Home? "Stand Your Ground Law" Facing Changes
Written by Your 5News Team
Last updated on March 18, 2013 @ 12:24AM
Created on March 17, 2013 @ 9:50PM
"A guy's carrying your DVD player out the door. Can you use force to stop that guy?" asked CPL Waggamon of the WV State Police.
Now, you may be able to use deadly force to stop someone from stealing your property.
Our state honors the Stand Your Ground Law. Under West Virginia code 55-7-22: " A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence is justified in using reasonable and proportionate force, including deadly force, against an intruder or attacker to prevent a forcible entry..."
But now, there's some proposed changes to the law.
CPL. Waggamon added, "The Legislature does wants to change the law, to eliminate some of the grey area that's there. It doesn't really give you the rules in black and white. The whole thing's grey."
That's the current law. But the grey area is the problem. You must use "proportionate force." That means you must decide quickly if you're being threatened enough to kill someone. And what's proportionate force for a 100 pound woman, is not the same as it would be for a 200 pound man.
"You can't just shoot someone because they're walking on your property. You've got to be in fear for your safety. It still has to be investigated. It's just not automatic, where you shoot and kill someone, and then you're off the hook. It doesn't work like that."
Changes in the bill would remove the part requiring self-defense to be proportionate to the attack. It would also mean you could use force to protect another person.  And it authorizes the use of deadly force against someone they believe is committing a robbery.
So, you might not have to worry as much about being sued by the family of the attacker, which has happened.
Military Veteran Brittany Wallace said, "Yes, I do think that's a good idea. If I feel my life is being threatened, and I shoot and there's a whole bunch of questions, I'm just going to be happen to be alive."
Critics of the law say it encourages a "shoot first, ask questions later" attitude.
While the bill will help to eliminate the grey areas of the current laws, the general rule of thumb: "Use common sense."

Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (2)
Mar 19, 2013 at 9:16 AM
I will always do what I feel I must do to protect me, my family and my property from those who think they can just continue robbing, killing others and continue having crooked judges/lawyers get them off to do it over and over again! We have a RIGHT to defend ourselves in this country; although a lot of left-leaning nuts think otherwise! With the drug usage in this country...it is getting worse; decent folks have the right to take care of business when threatened by useless degenerates.
Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM
It is about time that taxpaying people has the right to protect all they work for from people stealing for drug money
WVFX FOX10 on Facebook
WVFX FOX10 on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV Mobile App