304 SPORTS SCORES
  • Buckhannon-Upshur 44Preston 14Final[ view all ]
  • Tucker County 42Petersburg 0Final[ view all ]
  • Robert C. Byrd 21Elkins 0Final[ view all ]
  • Clay-Battelle 18Notre Dame 36Final[ view all ]
  • Bridgeport 42Fairmont Senior 7Final[ view all ]
  • Liberty 7Doddridge County 26Final[ view all ]
  • Williamstown 24Ritchie County 6Final[ view all ]
  • University 27Morgantown 20Final[ view all ]
  • East Fairmont 21Philip Barbour 7Final[ view all ]
  • Grafton 54North Marion 284th Qtr.[ view all ]
  • South Harrison 7Paden City 64th Qtr.[ view all ]
  • Parkersburg Catholic 20Gilmer County 6Halftime[ view all ]
  • Valley Wetzel 15Tyler Consolidated 14Halftime[ view all ]
NOW PLAYING: Fox 10 at 10 10:00 PM - 10:30 PMWATCH NOW!
National News | Closings | Funerals | HighScore | Monday's Most Wanted | Crime Watch | TV Listings | Lottery | Bio's | FCC File | More ›
   
   
 
What it Costs to Raise a Kid: $241,080
Written by Your 5News Team
Created on August 14, 2013 @ 2:56PM
(CBS MoneyWatch) Children will cost you roughly one-quarter of a million dollars before they turn age 18. If you send them to college, you could spend twice as much, according to a new report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Offspring are also far more costly, even on an inflation-adjusted basis, than they used to be, the agency found. In 1960, children in the baby boom generation cost their parents 23 percent less to raise than kids do today. That amounts to a total of $195,690 in inflation-adjusted dollars, versus today's average of $241,080.
 
The biggest factor behind the rising cost of child-rearing is out-of-pocket health payments and child care expenses, which have both more than doubled. The USDA partly attributes the spiraling cost of child care to the fact that there are far more two-income families in 2013 than there were in 1960. That means more families are reporting day-care expenses.
 
Of course, if a couple opts to have one spouse stay home to raise the kids, that's a cost, too. But the USDA didn't account for the so-called opportunity cost of wages that went unearned by a stay-at-home spouse in 1960. Even today it ignores the half of U.S. households that say they have no day care or education expenses. 
 
Theoretically, if the researchers had used the same formula used in 1960, the disparity would be less severe. Still, where child care and education accounted for just 2 percent of the cost of having children in 1960 -- a total of $3,914, or roughly $301 annually (through age 13) -- it now commands 18 percent of the cost, an average annual expense of $3,338. 
 
No matter how you slice it, in short, the cost or raising children is far higher in 2013 than half a century ago. 
 
Meanwhile, even at $241,080, this estimate of the cost of having kids is likely to be conservative. The government's exhaustive explanation of how it figures the numbers notes that the cost of housing your child is figured based on the incremental cost of buying a house with an additional bedroom. It doesn't account for those who might move to a more costly neighborhood to get the benefit of better schools or a safer environment.
 
The estimates also assume some economies of scale that come with having more than one child, such as being able to use hand-me-down clothing and shared babysitters. If you have just one child, you'll spend comparatively more.
 
But the USDA rightly notes that the amount you spend on a child - like the amount you spend on yourself -- will vary based on household income. The lowest-income group studied -- those earning less than $60,640 -- will spend an average of $216,910 on their youngest child by the time he or she reaches the age of 18. Those earning the most -- $105,000 or more -- will spend upwards of $500,000.

Share
Add your Comment
You must have an active WDTV.COM user account to post comments. Please login to your account, or create your free account today!

Comments (0)
WDTV on Facebook
WDTV on Twitter
WDTV on YouTube
Contact WDTV
WDTV RSS Feeds
WDTV SMS
WDTV Mobile App